• Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      We know that, through much study, it really isn’t. And the negatives outweigh the positives especially compared to other methods. It’s a trauma response more than anything at that point and if it does work they probably just used those skills to realize what an asshole the shamer was/is.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’m not here to play olympics with people who struggle to empathize with others. I’m sorry awful things have happened to you, that doesn’t give you any right to invalidate someone else’s pain.

          • Marcbmann@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            My god guys it was terrible, my Dad sent me to the store for a bucket of steam, and the cashier laughed at me.

            How was I supposed to know steam didn’t come in pre-packaged buckets? Nobody ever explained the particulars of steam packaging!

            Literally nothing worse could ever happen to me. Now I’ll be in therapy for years.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It really isn’t. Think about a kid embarrassing their parent over some tech thing they don’t know.

      *Taking from my other reply:

      To understand something (think critically) you need to know the information. So it boils down to embarrassing someone for not knowing things. There is too much in life to know absolutely everything, thus my example on tech.

      The parent is supposed to teach the child that information. Not mock and embarrass them for not already knowing it.