• ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m beginning to think he doesn’t have values of his own and has discovered that he can easily keep dangling simplistic talking points in front of America’s most ignorant and most vulnerable segment of simpletons and morons.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The probability we’re going to have Trump for a second term is so much higher than anyone realizes and it terrifies me every time some Millennial/GenZ shrugs and says “there’s no way that dude is getting in” with no intention of voting, because I have seen all this before.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I might take it one step further and say that these aren’t Trump’s ideas. These are fossil fuel industry talking points that get pumped through a rich network of right wing talk radio dorks and Brietbart style news feeds and Joe Rogan guests.

        Trump and his ilk are just the guys who can turn a talking point about “nobody is buying electric cars” into a real policy of “nobody is allowed to buy electric cars from over the border”.

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    It is hard to believe this moron has a chance of being president again. We are a doomed country.

    • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t let the media and talking heads convince you of anything.

      There are a great majority of people who want nothing to do with Trump, his Russian bootlicking or any of his other xenophobic hate.

      Just vote.

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        But the system is rigged so that a relatively small minority of morons can fuck shit up for everybody else. So yeah, guys, vote like your life depends on it because it literally does.

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          And those of us who are voting and get elected will, and have been, continue to stop vote rigging, jerrymandering, and voter intimidation.

          Voting doesn’t end at the end of the presidential election. It involves your local elections too. Especially anything to do with your local educational system.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The party of limiting personal freedom.

    If I want to buy an electric car, why shouldn’t I be able to?

  • Doxatek@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t like Trump either. But as others here have said he didn’t say this. That’s a quote from the article the quote from him says “You won’t be able to sell those cars” not “I’ll ban all electric car sales”

    • Devcatdan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why are people downvoting this? Trump is a literal poison, but misinformation is misinformation. The author changed the meaning: “You won’t be able to sell those cars, because they won’t have EV incentives” NOT “because I’ll ban them.”

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trump is a literal poison, but misinformation is misinformation.

        Trump: “Won’t someone rid me of these meddlesome electric vehicles?!”

        Media: “Trump calls for elimination of electric vehicles.”

        Terminally Online Guy: “Um, aktuly, its ephebophilia”.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        One implies he will personally forbid them from selling.

        The other implies no one will want to buy them because they’ll be too expensive by their nature.

        • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          4 years of Trump as president, and people are still trying to see nuance in what he says? Were you asleep from 2017-2020? We know enough about how he talks to know what he means. He’s absolutely talking about blocking EV sales.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s unreal. I’m convinced people are just collectively too stupid to ever fully escape this constant pull towards fascism.

            We should maybe start getting used to the idea that we had a nice century or so of relative freedom and prosperity, and we’re lucky to have been alive during it.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              He is still a dangerous cheat, corrupted, megalomaniac, and kind of stupid and easily manipulated. It’s just that he probably didn’t mean a ban in this case.

              Just because he is dangerous doesn’t mean we should also embrace misinformation against him. Plenty of legitimate information is damning enough, to embrace misinformation sites nothing but undermine the legitimate reasons to keep him the hell away from leadership.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                I will accept just about anything to stop the fascism from taking control of our country at this point.

                This has already been a propaganda war, the left just sucks at it. And when you’re up against people willing to fight dirty with the future of the Republic at stake, and you’re not willing to meet them at their level, you lose every time. And this is something we cannot lose.

                So no, I’m ok with interpreting what we all fucking know he meant anyway, based on the ridiculous way he speaks and having to listen to it constantly for the past decade. I’m ok with that little stretch if it means my gay and trans friends in Florida don’t end up against the fucking wall in a year and a half.

                It’s starting to get dire. I really don’t think people grasp what happens if he wins again. And it will happen quickly.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I was not saying he is correct, saying that was his likely meaning in this context. He’s not exactly got a great track record of being smart or correct. Just in this case he didn’t seem to mean a ban outright.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s a funny way to get the auto companies and unions in the three states Biden really needs to go all in on Biden.

    I’m confused. Both of them seem to be trying to lose this election.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why? Better margins on gas cars, I think industrial Michigan would love this because it means they won’t be squeezed into electric car manufacturing. I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets. The consumer may not like it, unions may not like it, but the companies could give a damn.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I get told by big 3 engineers that if it wasn’t for the subsidies they wouldn’t be electrifying their fleets.

        We’ve been subsidizing ICE vehicles for the better part of the last century. Famously, Bush Jr passed enormous tax cuts for SUVs and other “light trucks” back in 2003.

        Congress recently passed a tax bill, as proposed in President Bush’s economic stimulus plan, that offers a $100,000 tax credit for business owners who purchase any vehicle weighing 6,000 pounds or more when fully loaded.

        Because these rules didn’t require a business to exist for a minimum length of time or post a profit, car dealerships would help buyers spin up small businesses on the spot in order to avail themselves of the credit. SUVs flooded the market and have been a load on the national car fleet ever since.

        Now we’re pivoting to electric vehicles in order to stay competitive globally, and (fossil fuel endorsed) business magazines have suddenly started poo-pooing the idea of vehicle subsidies as unnatural. Curious.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Working at the onion must be so. hard. right now

    “Donald Trump will kill ‘at least seven prostitutes’ while in office.”

    No… how about “Donald Trump sings the entire National Anthem on key.”

    “Donald Trump finally unmasked as secret santa in Harlem children’s program.”

    Wait… I think I unlocked a secret.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Donald Trump goes home to family, enjoys quiet evening with loved ones”

  • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can anyone give a legit reason as to why EVs are bad? Because all I’ve seen is “they don’t make cool BROOM BROOM noise” and “they’re bad for the environment” which is only true because of oil and gas companies bribing governments to restrict green energy infrastructure

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      theres only two temporary reasons. 1. the environmental reason is less the gas vs battery situation, but more the EVs are heavy, and the biggest pollutant are car tires. this tied with US consumer obsession of SUV sized vehicles dont help.

      the other is not all places have an equivalent “gas tax” which is used for road maintainance usually for EVs since, well they dont use gas.

      both fixable problems but can be considered a problem

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials for the batteries results in a lot of pollution, and the charging is often provided by coal burning plants?

        • masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Isn’t it also that sourcing the raw materials

          This also leads to a shit-ton of attendant neocolonial shitfuckery - but nobody in the US really cares about that.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I mean to be fair, the Chinese EVs are largely fake…

    But, EVs in general are still the way of the future.

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s some pretty good bait. I would have left out the part about paying their fair share for fuel and gas infrastructure because that’s a giveaway.

      The alternative to this style would be to come at it sideways as “let the free market decide, and it’ll die out because…” then list off some talking points about how much fun it is to roll coal on anyone on a bicycle.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          For anyone actually believing this, in Alberta the gas taxes go to the general fund. Vehicle registration, provincial income, and federal income taxes are where the vast majority of public infrastructure money comes from.

          Plus notice how this particular troll was unsubtle about moving the goalposts from fuel infrastructure to road infrastructure.

          In addition, now they’re talking about taxing them instead of outright banning them and using the weasel word “unless” while being incorrect instead of being authoritative and incorrect.

          Come on, this was worse than before. 2/10. Get your shit together if you’re going to troll.

    • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’re leading Canada in the race to which province can demonstrate the most short-sighted stupidity, that’s for sure.