VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agoMath Rulediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageMath Rulediscuss.tchncs.deVOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 6 months agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejanNatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 months agoThis is the “Lagrangian standard model” - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it. https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und When you DON’T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.
minus-squaredon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months ago assume spherical chickens in a vacuum lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.
minus-squareFrenziedFelidFanatic@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThe SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.
This is the “Lagrangian standard model” - the mathematical formula explaining basically all physics as we know it.
https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/the-deconstructed-standard-model-equation?language_content_entity=und
When you DON’T assume spherical chickens in a vacuum, this is what you gotta calculate.
lol that’s the next multiverse over, our solution works only with spherical cows in a vacuum.
The SM is half the puzzle. The other half being Einstein’s field equations (which, despite the beautiful notation, are just as complex). Also, I will note that there are some spherical chickens in this equation as well—like massless neutrinos.