Thing is tho, in most North American cities you’re more likely to get splattered by some jackass in his toy F150 if you ride a bike. The North American city needs to be reformed and replanned before cycling can be mass adopted.
I wouldn’t say so. Existing infrastructure can be modified to create bike-friendly cities. But what happens most usually is city councils go for the cheapest option which is just painting a line a metre from the curb and calling it a bike lane. Not only is this the cheapest way, it’s the least effective and most unsafe way. So when it inevitably fails, the city can go “Oops, oh well, I guess that didn’t work” and never have to spend money on making better infrastructure again. The problem has never been the building or the ability to do so. It’s always been a political one.
Ride with a rifle on your back. They may not see you but they’ll sniff the gun out a mile away and give you a friendly wave as they drive by leaving plenty of room.
Thing is tho, in most North American cities you’re more likely to get splattered by some jackass in his toy F150 if you ride a bike. The North American city needs to be reformed and replanned before cycling can be mass adopted.
If you won’t build it, they won’t come.
If they don’t come, we won’t build it.
The usual catch 22.
I wouldn’t say so. Existing infrastructure can be modified to create bike-friendly cities. But what happens most usually is city councils go for the cheapest option which is just painting a line a metre from the curb and calling it a bike lane. Not only is this the cheapest way, it’s the least effective and most unsafe way. So when it inevitably fails, the city can go “Oops, oh well, I guess that didn’t work” and never have to spend money on making better infrastructure again. The problem has never been the building or the ability to do so. It’s always been a political one.
Ride with a rifle on your back. They may not see you but they’ll sniff the gun out a mile away and give you a friendly wave as they drive by leaving plenty of room.