Summary

Key leaders of the “Abandon Harris” movement, which encouraged voters to oppose Kamala Harris due to U.S. support for Israel during the Gaza war, are now expressing unease about Trump’s incoming administration.

Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.

However, concerns are growing over his Cabinet picks, such as Mike Huckabee and Tulsi Gabbard, which some see as troubling for Muslim communities.

  • Floon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    It gets harder to continually extend sympathy and solidarity with all of the fucknuts who are ostensibly allies on the left, when they focus on a single media-focused disaster, and they try to “send a message” to their own side, by backstabbing them and helping the fascist who will be 1000x worse.

    Progressives who proclaim their hate for both parties are simply binary thinkers whose privilege insulates them from the consequences of their “principled stands”. They wonder why the country doesn’t just hand all power over to Progressives… go blow.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Unfortunately it boiled down to selecting the lesser of the two evils and the Abandon Harris clowns chose the neo-Nazi MAGAts which will send, for free, a nice assortment of 155 mm artillery shells to Israel… From my point of view, zero sympathy for your FAFO.

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. They’re getting exactly what they voted for, whether they like it or not. They might not have liked Harris’ limp wristed attempts at encouraging moderation and restraint, but Trump’s plan was to “Finish the problem” and will not just enable, but actively encourage genocide.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ll never understand how people could vote for Trump over Harris on the Israel thing.

      Trump was crystal clear he would give Israel whatever they needed to get it done and quick. Democrats rolled over for Israel but at least made it known they weren’t happy about it. Which is most certainly not enough but still.

      I just hope the Democratic party takes the hint that their extremely middle-of-the-road approach to these and many other serious problems is killing them during elections. They should stop trying to please everyone (and especially the far-right) and commit to an actual opposing viewpoint.

      • sudo42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Democratic Party is not trying to please everyone. They’re answering to their owner’s commands and campaigning to voters in ways that don’t offend their owner’s demands.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Honestly I’m thinking a lot of this was another Russia-sponsored propaganda campaign. I’ve noticed that WhAt AbOuT IsRaEl is coming up a lot in response to articles or discussions about the shit they’re pulling, as if one can’t oppose the shitty actions of both.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        No Trump lied he would bring peace. Harris said she would give Israel everything it needs. You are switching the sides around.

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Ah yes my differing opinion is because I’m a mindless sheep caught in an echo chamber but you, oh enlightened one, are here to educate us with your unbiased, very informed, well-sourced facts that trump our feefees.

              So where are these sources?

          • ours@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trump’s peace is by massive weapons exports to Israel so they could carpet Gaza faster and call for an end to the war. Can’t have war in Gaza if there are no Palestinians left!

            He promised some vaguer peace in Ukraine and we’re all afraid of what that’s going to translate into.

  • SolNine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    shocking - It’s almost as if there was a coordinated media campaign to paint both sides the same, and convince a bunch of people to vote against their own self interests. Absolutely did not see this coming… Nope, absolutely not.

  • recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    No no no,they saved Palestine, remember?

    Now that the Dems aren’t in control all those Palestinians are perfectly safe.

    Right, tankies? That’s all you were screeching about back in November. Now it’s cricket chirps, like Palestine even mattered to you lot. Disgusting.

    • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      There has been a recurring argument (not mine, heaven forbid) both prior to and in the aftermath of the election that not voting for the dems would show them that they can’t keep running away to the right and still expect to win. It would teach them a lesson.

      It baffles me that they think a) the Dems would actually learn the lesson, b) the alternative wouldn’t be that much worse and c) the alternative that quite explicitly aimed to abolish democracy entirely would willingly afford the dems a chance to learn that lesson. If they can’t eliminate democracy itself, they’ll try to neuter and bias it as heavily as possible until they’ve got the same kind of pseudo-democratic one-party fuckery that you see in other countries like… China, North Korea, Russia, Belarus…

      Huh, that’s funny, seems like all the countries whose boots they’re so eager to lick. I’m sure that’s coincidence, right?

      Actually, that’s a lie. I don’t believe it’s coincidence at all. I think it’s part of a deceitful strategy to undermine democracy through spreading willful ignorance and channeling voter frustration and disillusionment into frustration with democracy itself. Hell, there are even people claiming that a dictatorship is a necessity of revolution, that you can’t build a new and better system without placing someone in charge of building it - because that worked out so fucking well with the other communist revolutions, right?

      Every single fucker who gargles dictator cock under the guise of “communism” and “leftism” is an authoritarian, a traitor against the people they feign class solidarity with. You don’t save democracy by not participating. You don’t hold politicians accountable by supporting their opponents.

      And that’s being charitable and assuming they’re just misguided, not intentionally malicious foreign actors.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I love how you are being downvoted without anyone actually providing a counter point. Because you are absolutely right.

      Leading up to the election lemmy was flooded with Palestine bullshit and Genocide Joe, and people that suggested it’s a war started by fucking Israel and you should be boycotting them were downvoted.

      A lot of people here got swept up in the propaganda, and it was painful to see how dumb my side can be, but here we are.

      Orange man is coming and suddenly no-one is posting about Palestine and every thread I’m in doesn’t have people screeching genocide Joe.

      I’m fully convinced lemmy was flooded with foreign assets spreading bullshit and hurting democratic turnout.

      It’s painful to see how effective it was, an an issue so ridiculous I couldn’t have believed it if it was in a book. Country X, with president Y attacks Z, and idiots here are screaming at county U with president J…

      • SolNine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It wasn’t just Lemmy, I know otherwise reasonably intelligent people who became literally brainwashed from TikTok. We’re talking far left, never Trumper’s, knew he was an existential threat, but couldn’t have their moral superiority tarnished and HAD to vote 3rd party. They bought into that propaganda hook, line and sinker.

    • markko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I’m not from the US but I know that I would really struggle morally to cast a vote for either party.

      Yes, voting for Trump because of Palestine is stupid, but I can easily see how voting for the party that keeps sending money and weapons, and supporting them in the UN, while pretending to ask them to “be more careful about killing civilians”, would not be very desirable either.

      The US electoral system is absolute dogshit, but in my opinion the Dems lost this election all by themselves.

      Edit: are the downvotes because you disagree, or because you’re upset that I’m right?

      • derfunkatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Mainly because they are members of the class of people that will benefit, directly and indirectly, from a Trump presidency.

        Knowing this, they aren’t stupid for voting for the person who will enable the gross accumulation of wealth through the systematic deregulation of industries and privatization of government services. There’s one group of people who will benefit from this: the wealthy (who are disproportionately white and male).

        The idiots are people who voted for Trump thinking that his administration will result in a net positive for them socially and economically.

        Voting against your interests is dumb; voting inline with your interests is not.

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    hypocrites, these people are two faced hypocrites. they get what they wanted with the election and now their all upset? if these people are not the definition of a hypocrite idk what is.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, they voted for the leopards eating faces party and now their faces are being eaten by leopards. Huh.

      Funny how that works.

        • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get the joke and at this point I’m disillusioned enough to laugh at it. The Democratic party is so disconnected from the working class that, assuming there is another election, I don’t know what’s next.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            America was built on this stuff. Go ask a native american. Theres always been a group that is systematically abused and murdered for profit. As long as americans value money over morals this will keep going.

            • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’re not wrong, but there was a time when the regulatory capture was not so complete, when politicians were not openly bought and sold… Am I just having nostalgia for a time that never was? Maybe… I still have hope though.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think you are right about regulatory capture, just I think it was always technical limitations rather than people making better decisions.

                • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Yeah, that makes sense too. I think there are definitely some technical limitations, design flaws, perverse incentives, etc. baked into the political system that have led us where we are today. It’s a bit too resistant to change.

      • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        People who ignore the realities of strategic voting in a FPTP system, then pat themselves on the back for their moral superiority are hypocrites. Anti-Genocide wasn’t even on the table. Ignoring literally every other issue that was on the table just so they can feel good about throwing away their vote makes them hypocrites.

        The Palestinian people have gained absolutely nothing from those anti-genocide votes. They’re virtue-signalling at best, intentional spoiler votes at worst.

        Meanwhile, there are labour protections, checks on corporate enshittification, mechanisms to slow down the accumulation of wealth and institutions of democracy that the incoming administration will tear down (or at least try to) that the alternative wouldn’t. All of these are victims of that arrogance, to think that an anti-genocide vote is worth more than an anti-christofascism(+genocide) vote.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re virtue-signalling

          Harris lost across nearly every single demographic. Thats disengagement, not virtue signallers. You wish it was virtue signallers so you would have someone to be mad at besides Harris.

          • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Oh I have plenty of people to be mad at - Putin, Netanyahu, Trump, Harris, Biden, the DNC, the conservative wing of the Democratic Party, authoritarian bootlickers masquerading as leftists…

            Voter disengagement is an issue, yes, but people advocating for voting against Harris on grounds of voting against Genocide (which, you know, is the whole topic here) fail doubly: First, they pretend it’s the core issue of the election and their vote puts them on the anti-genocide side, and second, they pretend it was a topic of the election at all, such that there would even be an anti-genocide side to put them on.

            So yes, I am mad at people pretending that voting against Harris somehow makes them more virtuous. I’m even more mad at the people voting against her for actually relevant reason, but that’s not the topic here.

            • kreskin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              So yes, I am mad at people pretending that voting against Harris somehow makes them more virtuous.

              Sometimes when given an impossible choice the only possible choice is not to act, or to choose something thats not on offer. Some people felt they had to make that choice in the last election, and I dont see how you cant empathize with that. Some of them werent voting for trumps policies as much as they were voting for trump to come in and do what he said he’d do-- burn this system to the ground with a flamethrower. If your family were getting genocided and you existed in a voting system which gave no choice on the ballot but to continue it, wouldnt you be brave enough make that third choice, or would you simply vote to kill your own?

              I’m mad just like you– I’m mad at the DNC, the centrists, and Biden/Harris for creating that situation and not forcing some other outcome. Sometimes these bad things happen because we allow for them to and make space for them to exist. You and me.

              Why didnt MANY more Dems register their dissatisfaction with genocide in the “uncommitted” vote? Are we so indifferent to what bad policies Biden/Harris was proposing? It would have cost Dems nothing, Biden was going to win over Williamson in that half arsed primary anyway. But the dem voters by and large couldnt even be bothered to lift a finger to signal disapproval with our government sponsoring a far right wing genocide of some “browns” (and some reporters, doctors, aid workers, american citizens etc) in some far away country. By and large, only the youth, progressives, and muslims were willing to even do this symbolic vote to message our leadership that this stuff mattered a lot.

              So you’re angry at the victims now huh. I’m struggling to be concerned about centrist anger. We’re all going down civlization’s toilet together now, on the centrists watch. Maybe the centrist dem voters will finally feel that they have something in common with anyone but their own immediate family and their bank accounts. But frankly I’m not holding my breath, and I dont care much about centrist anger myself. Why take advice or criticism from those you dont respect?

              • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                An impossible choice between…?

                The persistent myth that both parties are equally bad is patently bullshit propaganda by those fostering that disengagement. Pretending that all the other issues don’t matter in the face of the decision between “not going to stop genocide” and “going to make it worse” is narrow-minded. Again, if someone thinks “I’m not going to vote for genocide” is a justification for “I’m not going to vote against the fascists”, they’re trying to show their virtue with respect to genocide, while not actually caring about anything else except that signalling of virtue. That’s the hypocrisy.

                • kreskin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The persistent myth that both parties are equally bad is patently bullshit propaganda by those fostering that disengagement.

                  I cant agree. The utter lack of pressure on dem leadership to counterbalance AIPAC money is not how “democracy” is supposed to work, and by acting like we have no choice in these things we guarantee a continuance of that lack of choice forever. I’m not up for that.

                  Good chat, I dont think we are going to come together on this point, but I thank you for the civility and I hope we all come out of this somehow.

  • cmrn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East

    what

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Abandon Harris campaign was quite clear they did not expect Trump to be better. The writer has a pretty clear agenda.

    • Iceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Discipline the voters. Don’t dare try to influence our constantly right drifting policies. You better vote for us no matter what or else.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    287
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East”

    How the FUCK would you hope for that? Have you been living under a rock and didn’t know who Trump actually is and what he does? The Muslim ban Trump? That Trump? Bringing peace to the Middle East? Seriously?

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      174
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The American electorate is stunningly stupid and disconnected from reality. Look up some of the trending Google searches on election day, they’re stupider than you think

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Devotion to religion is also a red flag for inability to think critically. Being conditioned not to think for yourself is a tenant of all religions. The more fundamental the less thought is happening. Trump and the republicans have realized this and used it to his advantage almost exclusively.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is a bullshit excuse. The average America receives a very well rounded education. They choose not to use it.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yes: the guy who banned Muslims from entering the US on his previous term will end the war and bring peace to the Middle East.

      monkey’s paw curls

      palestinians are thoroughly genocided and Gaza + West Bank + other lebensraum in the area have all structures reduced to grade #7 gravel

      That is also technically peace, in that there is no more fighting. It’s just a really bad one.

      Truly, the gullibility of some people simply beggars belief.

      • takeda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, his vision of peace was Israel getting rid of anyone who they don’t have good relationship with.

    • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wait wait, I remember a guy who was constantly arguing and berating everyone about how Biden was just the worst Satan reincarnation or some shit and how we all needed to band together against both him and Harris. Oooh @HomerianSymphony , you still around, bud?

      We’d like an interview.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        They were probably just astroturfing, and now that they’ve successfully completed their objective, they’ve got no reason to stick around.

        I still see a handful of the useful idiots that were on here paroting those talking points, and I have to wonder if they’ve been able to accept that they were sold a bill of goods.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I have to wonder if they’ve been able to accept that they were sold a bill of goods.

          They were the bill of goods. They were a line item on the Trump campaign budget. Their temp job is over so they’re not posting.

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Genocide Joe is a demon who put his own ego over the good of the country. He knew he couldn’t win, he knew Kamala couldn’t win, and yet he (and his/her campaign) stuck with the losing playbook because they don’t believe anything they say

        • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          From what I see the user went to Bluesky, but we don’t know if he really did it or if his account was suspended.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        What did sticking with genocide Joe and Kamala get you? They knew they were gonna lose and didn’t change course 1 bit

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You sure aren’t living up to that name with comments like that.

          Look, it wasn’t about Biden or Harris or Obama or whomever else you want to project your shitty little excuses on. This cycle was about stopping a then would-be dictator. We were trying to do right by the world. Not by you. Not by the MAGA cultists. Not by Gaza or Ukraine alone. For everyone through stopping someone who had made it clear he, and through the agreement and support of the GOP, would do worse.

          Then you single issue idiotic disappointments wouldn’t wake the fuck up. Yes, the Dems fucked up. Harris started strong and some snob Left probably ancient “strategist” convinced her to shift gears and she toned it down, along with other bad choices. It was shit. You know what I can die knowing I did?

          Not voting someone who might actually be fucking evil BACK into the Office of the Biggest God Damn Chair we have. So kiss my ass, Schwdinehund, at least we tried to stop what’s coming.

          • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            Biden had no chance of winning. Kamala had no chance of winning. Their campaigns knew that.

            If stopping a would be dictator is so important they would run someone with a chance. The Democratic party is dead, sticking with it means you want to lose

            • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Sticking with it wasn’t a choice. You seem to believe taking our current situation and just rolling that shit back is a time machine we have the capacity of producing. There was no other candidate and we knew that. Unless you have a realistic suggestion that would have worked at the time.

              We’re listening.

              • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Biden put his ego over country and stayed in the race because he didn’t care if Trump won. Kamala accepted the nomination even though her team knew she couldn’t win because she didn’t care if Trump won. The Democrats don’t care if they lose, supporting them means you don’t care if you lose which means you don’t really care about stopping the would-be dictator.

                • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Okay, at the risk of being censored: You’re actually being stupid.

                  We do NOT support the current Democrats, nor the party, nor their way of doing things. We supported trying to make sure Trump did not get a second term by standing beside the only candidate(s) that had a chance because there wasn’t anyone else. So stop for a second and think because it’s clear you’re a single issue voter: You can’t stop repeating the same faulty freaking logic.

                  Then is not now.

                  Then does not mean we supported them.

                  We wanted a better world. Days where we don’t have to worry so much. We support Gaza and Ukraine.

                  If this and much, much more means supporting the opponent of a would-be dictator, then we fucking do so. That’s the difference. WE SAW THE BIGGER PICTURE and did what we had to do.

                  It was what had to be done. The Dems fucked up their messaging. However, people like you chose to fuck our home and possibly the world to greater and lesser degrees because you stand so damned fucking stalwart it’s like trying to convince a brick wall to fall over with kind words of encouragement. If I live through these next four years I hope to be a part of the team that writes the history books. If I am I’ll make sure to cite people like you, @MisterScruffy , for your contribution towards tyranny and dictatorship.

                  And for the record: Yes, I’m pissed. Not at you, you’re dumb. At what brought us to this point.

    • finley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      These are people who believe in invisible sky wizards. Clearly, they’re capable of believing any amount of BS.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I have zero sympathy for those who only regret their vote for Trump now that his policies - which were always obvious - come back to haunt them personally.

  • Allonzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    225
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I voted for Harris. I voted for Biden. I voted for Clinton.

    I still wouldn’t warn a single one of them if they were about to get hit by a bus.

    Its harm reduction. They don’t solve anything. They just keep us treading water sinking slowly whereas Republicans start taking a hammer to the hull to open up new holes.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I voted for Harris. I voted for Biden. I voted for Clinton.

      I still wouldn’t warn a single one of them if they were about to get hit by a bus.

      American Democracy in a nutshell. You get two choices, they’re both awful for different reasons. One of them wants to see you executed for your religious beliefs/sexual preferences/nation of origin. The other is continent to sell bunker buster bombs to some raving psychotic mass murderers overseas. Nobody is going to do shit about climate change, though, so we’re all on the clock in the long run.

      Its harm reduction.

      It increasingly feels like the closest thing to harm reduction the US achieved was the time Trump fucked up his COVID response and a bunch of his senior leadership choked to death on their own lung fluid.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        There’s only one man who’s done any meaningful harm reduction in your country and your judicial system is charging him with terrorism.

      • Dearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        There was roughly 20 different elected positions on my ballot.

        The real problem with American politics is everyone is so focused on the POTUS that they ignore the politicians who have an actual measurable effect on their quality of life.

        I challenge anyone to look up your local town hall and see when the next city council meeting is. Go to it and see what they talk about and vote on. Notice the other people who go.

        Many cities have public meetings for police oversite too. They’re even less attended than city council meetings

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Another massive problem is the voting system which could barely be designed better for forcing a two party system on you. There is no room for someone getting 30% of the vote and of course they should then have about that much influence.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I challenge anyone to look up your local town hall and see when the next city council meeting is. Go to it and see what they talk about and vote on. Notice the other people who go.

          I’ve been to a few city council meetings. When you’re there as part of an organization lobbying for a particular policy, you can at least see the terms of the debate and understand who to lobby, what the blockades are, and why a seemingly good-idea isn’t getting through. But if you’re just sitting in on meetings, its like tuning into CSPAN at a random point in the day. You’ve got no historical context. You don’t know who you’re listening to or why they’re talking. And there’s a ton of maneuvering going on behind the scenes that you can’t glimpse because you’re not really a part of it.

          Add to the problem, a lot of people aren’t really wedded to their communities. I live in a neighborhood in which people move in and out every five years or so, chasing a better job or looking for better schools or trying to find more garage space for their giant cars or cashing out on a sudden jump in their home price. Trying to get them engaged in a fight over the ten-year-plan for mass transit is basically impossible because most of them won’t be here in ten years.

          I don’t say this to discourage anyone from going. But this isn’t something you can just bootstrap your way into. You really need a community of more knowledgeable and engaged people to introduce you to what is going on and why. Otherwise, you’re just listening to a couple of people argue over the preferred way to renovate municipal drainage on the opposite side of town for an hour.

      • Tower@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 days ago

        It increasingly feels like the closest thing to harm reduction the US achieved was the time Trump fucked up his COVID response and a bunch of his senior leadership choked to death on their own lung fluid.

        Herman Cain approves this message.

      • Atrichum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        American Democracy in a nutshell. You get two choices, they’re both awful…

        The democratic process doesn’t start on election day.

            • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Yes give them more money, they’re doing such great things with the money that’s already given to them.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m not giving another dime to the Democratic Party so it’s more like 9,999,999 Democrats.

              I wouldn’t even be in the party if we didn’t have closed primaries in my state.

              • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                fair enough.

                1 million American leftists x $100 to Bernie Sanders or AOC in the primaries = $100 million

                and

                1 million American leftists x $100 to Green party = $100 million

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Liberal democracy starts with the donors in a smoke-filled room and ends with one side complaining that the election was rigged.

        • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It started well into the election cycle after Biden refused to honor his one term pledge.

          No time for a primary now! Oops didn’t mean to! /$

          First Past The Post voting has got to go, or else the USA is toast. A shame the democratic party believes themselves to be more important then the country itself.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Harm reduction is bad?

      Obviously, it’s not ideal, but one has to act according to the real life conditions… And in 2024, our only two options were “harm reduction,” and literal fascism with literal concentration camps.

      Fuck you if you didn’t choose harm reduction.

      • Allonzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        To be fair to them, we’re just delaying collapse. It is a choice.

        I agree with them that there’s no saving this constitutional structure. In one sense it’s cowardly, because there’s no escape from this capitalist slaughterhouse hellscape without collapse. Collapse is necessary. Trump will certainly usher that in faster.

        But Im too much of a softy to let the blood that always has to spill be on my hands.

        This country was irreparable since Reagan, a zombie nation oligarch piggie bank. My vote was a cowardly one for a few more years of quiet orderly slaughter, NOT peace.

        But we lost, so the slaughter will be loud and bigger than it’s ever been, so maybe it’s time for revolution if we want our kids to have anything left.

        Because in 4 years the DNC WILL anoint someone to meet Trump’s economy in the middle, and even I may not be able to stomach voting for that.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Kamala was in a weird place as well.

          Normally it’s easy for people to hold their noses for an incumbent. But if Kamala won. Shed run again in 2028.

          Which would mean from 2012 to 2032, there wouldn’t have been a fair Dem primary.

          20 fucking years…

          Party leaders don’t understand that when you take primaries away, it hurts general turnout. Because regardless of who wins, the primary is the time for the eventual candidate to get their finger on the pulse and see what voters want.

          Which is reliably that the Dem candidate moves left.

          Without a primary they move right and turnout goes down.

          We have literally decades of data that shows this, but it’s not what the donors want and the present DNC wants donations more than votes.

          Hopefully Winkler gets chair in a few months and that changes.

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The DNC would rather have Trump as POTUS than Sanders or AOC.

            With Trump, the bribe money keeps flowing to both party machines, They are both paid to keep this sociopath owned economy safe from the people.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              The DNC would rather have Trump as POTUS than Sanders or AOC.

              Always have…

              Which is the problem, and we have zero control over what the DNC does, literally the only leverage is not voting for them, which obviously is a huge risk with potentially disastrous results.

              Which is why now is the time to pressure the DNC and make noise.

              If Ben Winkler wins DNC chair because Kamala lost, it might actually be a net positive.

              If Kamala had won, we’d be stuck with Jamie Harrison again. A guy with little political experience whose only notable accomplishment was being “the only other option” to Lindsey Graham and raising an insane amount of money on that fact alone then losing the election.

              I don’t know why people are surprised with the 2024 result of they had any clue who was running the DNC…

              Raising money and losing elections is all Jaimie knows. And that’s what the DNC did under his leadership

              • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                Which is why now is the time to pressure the DNC and make noise.

                How would one pressure the DNC or make a noise they’re able to hear? And will it involve putting clamps on sensitive body parts and 150dB train horns?

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Some More News did a good summary of how the Democrats win when they have a primary - and move to the left - but lose when they don’t.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Realistically they weren’t gonna hold a fair primary anyway. If they held one we would’ve gotten candidate Shapiro, who would have been stomped into dust by Trump.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 days ago

              In large part because Jaimie Harrison was the DNC chair.

              There’s an upcoming vote for chair, and there’s some standouts and one crazy with no chance.

              But from what I know about them (not everything) we’re almost guaranteed a good chair with a very good chance of getting an amazing one.

              I’m no fan of the DNC, but there’s a real chance to turn everything around and it’s barely a month away

              • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Here’s hoping, though remember the people who voted for Harrison are still the ones voting. I remember we did get Howard Dean after his campaign, so hopefully there’s a similar thing that happens.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Jaimie got it because Biden appointed him…

                  He was the only option for DNC members to vote for, it’s a rubber stamp process when a Dem wins the presidential.

                  The only time they really vote is when a Dem president doesn’t win, or the chair resigns early (I think).

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I think there’s some truth in thinking that continuing to elect milquetoast corporatist neoliberal candidates just builds up more extremism and discontent as people continue to suffer under option A of 2 - so when eventually a neocon breaks through they tend to be bonkers. It’s why I’m so fucking disappointed in Starmier as he’s clearly going to do fuck all and likely hand the next election to the torries.

          That said, that’s a pretty fucking abstract view and there’s always a chance we get lucky. I voted for Harris but I was really hoping we’d get Senator Harris who actually gave a shit and, even if I knew for certain she’d be underwhelming I’d still fucking vote for her because Trump was worse on every issue and would directly cause a lot of additional human suffering. Women would be forced into unwanted pregnancies, trans people would be suppressed or worse - deaths would come from increased incidents of suicide and self-medication, and, lastly, (and I know a fuck ton of pushback on this point here) more Palestinians would die as Trump accelerated genocide.

          So yea, I really regret that we are constantly dealt such bad hands but harm reduction is always a good thing to pursue in the absence of better actions.

          Seriously though, when Biden dropped out fuck absolutely everyone who defended the DNC anointing Harris instead of running a snap primary.

          • Allonzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            At which point, I will roll my eyes, tear up my ballot, and go home. 24 years of voting for least worst, and phone banking for a primary candidate I actually liked in two campaigns to no avail will have been enough for me if the 2028 candidate isn’t an economic leftist, because I already feel like a sucker and capitalism enabler.

            The oligarchs were never not going to shoot the hostages for a tidy profit.

            • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              It doesn’t have to be a total waste, you can still chip your vote towards a third party to help them get that 5% that gets them ballot access and federal campaign funding.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you’re only voting for harm reduction year after year and doing nothing to try and organize grassroots opposition to the lesser evil, yes constantly voting harm reduction is bad. It’s how you allow lesser evils to grow into the larger evils of the current DNC, who care more about fundraising than winning.

        • aesthelete@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you’re only voting for harm reduction year after year and doing nothing to try and organize grassroots opposition to the lesser evil, yes constantly voting harm reduction is bad.

          The thing is that this is everyone in America. The left has practically no grassroots organization and expects online complaints about the DNC to magically accomplish something, and the right has astroturfed horse shit that that is on board with whatever the corporatist GOP wants to do.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            The left has practically no grassroots organization

            The left literally took over the Nevada Dem committee a few years ago.

            What have you done?

            • aesthelete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Oh, that’s right, I forgot it was my personal responsibility to organize the left. /s

              Not everyone can be or wants to be a full-time activist.

        • ATDA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          That been my realization. I voted for harm reduction for what 12 year now like a lot of us and have little to show for it if not less. Yes the other side is a factor but they also seem more successful in their braindead idiot agenda too.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            You clearly just weren’t voting hard enough.

            Yes the other side is a factor but they also seem more successful in their braindead idiot agenda too.

            The inability to acknowledge the appeal of the opposition and the persistent reliance on “my enemies are only strong because they are dumber than me” have lead to some really depressing political decisions by the Democrats. The Biden/Harris campaign in 2024 really seemed to boil down to saying “If you don’t vote for us, democracy is going away” and “Even Republicans from the Bush-Era like us, so you have to vote for us too”.

            And then they lost in a popular landslide, suggesting that (a) democracy is alive and well and (b) neither Republicans nor Democrats seem to like you.

            What if its not Republican voters who are stupid for supporting Trump? What if its Democrats who are stupid for supporting candidates lamer and more disappointing than Trump?

            • ATDA@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I mean I consider myself a progressive so yeah that’s pretty well on mark.

              To the lame point, I think a large part of not most Americans think knowledge is lame regardless so arguing things seriously is just dismissed as well.

              Le sigh.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think a large part of not most Americans think knowledge is lame

                People spend a lot of their younger years building an understanding of the world, then become cemented in a particular worldview as they get old.

                Trying to introduce new ideas to an old crowd is much more difficult than appealing to an audience of young people without any preexisting priors.

      • ...m...@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Fuck you if you didn’t choose harm reduction.

        …thirty years of choosing harm reduction brought us to this point…

        …i held my nose and voted against fascism, but if you want to blame someone, blame the f*cking fascists and blame the thirty years of harm reduction which enabled them: pluralities win, that’s how american democracy works…

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is such a dumb take. You can’t say “thirty years of harm reduction brought us here” with the implication that if Republicans won every election in the time frame things would somehow be better, unless you’re actually just a right wing voter.

          I’ll say it for the thousandth time: voting in national elections in no way affects your ability to do other activism. If your argument is along the lines of “voting for the worst option will unite the resistance and we’ll make real change”, well, I hope you realize that that “real change” is bloody revolution with an uncertain result.

          • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Harm reduction and neoliberalism just wont work, end of discussion. Its fucking 2024, if you want to beat republicans you need to elect progressives

          • makyo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            For years I’ve seen leftists complaining about ‘harm reduction’ and ‘lesser evil’ and how the dems are ignoring their vote. But all we ever do is bicker with ourselves. We don’t have a united front. We don’t have any reliable voting bloc.

            They literally don’t care about us because there is nothing to care about. If Dems court one leftist group they risk alienating another because of our unnecessary purity tests and virtue signaling. It’s so much easier and more reliable to get votes if you tack to the center so that’s what they do.

            Meanwhile we don’t do any meaningful activism or organizing. We don’t vote practically and only get excited about voting when we have an exciting candidate. Leftists seem to expect their vote to have power but it doesn’t have any. And it’s entirely our own fault because you have to actually do the work to get the power.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              do the work

              What work is this? Writing your representatives? Voting in primaries? Voting every year there’s an election no matter how local? Knocking on doors and phone banking? Donating to campaigns?

              And if that’s not the work, please tell me what the work actually is because I’ve done all those things and have no power to show for it.

              • makyo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Mad respect to you for the effort you put into it - all those things matter. Problem is we don’t do it as a community. Most leftists think their vote is the be-all end-all if they even vote at all, so of course not enough of us are doing what you’re doing.

                Beyond that, getting involved locally and/or running for office would be powerful too. Grassroots movements have been shown to work and we don’t have anything remotely like it.

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Clinton Clinton Bush 2 Bush 2 Obama Obama Fuckface Biden Fuckface

          Its as even as you can get over 9 terms (4:5)

          Let’s not forget how much absolute harm Bush and Fuckface caused, and I’m not even counting Fuckface’s homicidal COVID response.

          The US would have universal healthcare and a sane supreme Court if it wasn’t for Republicans.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Fuck you if you didn’t choose harm reduction.

        With caveats.

        A lot of people who chose to just not vote were given a choice between two people who want to genocide their family… Harm reduction wasn’t offered to them.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          two people who want to genocide their family

          Want vs will. There’s a small difference in that binary choice that you don’t need to both-sides it.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            Correct, but likely not how you like it…

            Harris WAS engaged in genocide of their families. Trump wanted to.

            So, yes, both-sidesing it is very applicable in this case.

      • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Neoliberalism and harm reduction wont work anymore. What the fuck do you think America has been doing the past three decades? If you want to beat republicans, you need to elect progressives, otherwise fascism will keep on rising.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        3 days ago

        If your friend is an alcoholic getting wasted on a bottle of vodka every night, switching them to beer because it has less alcohol is not harm reduction. Rescuing a young woman from Jack The Ripper and giving her to Jeffrey Epstein “for her safety” is not harm reduction. A professional fighter concerned about CTE switching to football is not harm reduction. The lesser of two evils is very much still evil.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Those are all literally harm reduction buddy. If those are the only options available you’d take them because they all mean a better chance of better results in the future. Of course, in these situations you would definitely have better options, but you’re deliberately framing it like there are no others. So are you comfortable saying you’d leave your friend alone with the bottle of vodka, let the woman get disemboweled, and not recommend the sport with helmets?

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          It is when both parties get the same orders from the same bribers on economic policy and merely war on how to or if to address some of the social issue symptoms, the ones that don’t effect their briber’s quarterly results.

          Example: they war over forced births, but abortion is often an ECONOMIC decision, and the markets have demanded 2 breadwinners the last few decades to make moar from themselves, which is antisocial and antifuture. You won’t hear either party calling for a single income for most to all being able to support a family. That’s a matter of economic policy. That’s a choice. There would objectively, naturally be fewer abortions without coersion if economic desperation wasn’t defended here by both parties, no threat of state violence required.

          No, our choice is on the social issue of forced births? No forced births? Your choice lol… Then get back to work, battery.

          • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            There are tons of ways to reduce abortion and, typically, those are supported by Democratic politicians and opposed by Republicans. The concern is not to reduce abortion, there’s actually very little concern about the actual number of abortions that happen by its opponents. The concern is that the opponents want an opportunity for themselves to take a “strong moral stance” against abortion. They prefer a world of more abortions which are illegal to a world of fewer abortions which are legal.

            • Allonzee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Agreed, but once again, the elephant in the room is not being able to afford to have children. Neoliberals stand in the way with Republicans on human citizens being able to afford a family with one child.

              It’s an important social issue, what I’m saying is almost all social issues are heavily informed by and often exacerbated by economic policy that ALEC had more say in than the American people.

              • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I think “one income families” would be a winner if you could convince people it was even possible. I think it’d be a hard sell in the modern culture.

                • Allonzee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  I think the United States, culturally, is on track to have about as much hope in positive change as your average Russian.

                  That’s what happens when you have a supposed generational leader calling for an age of positive progressive change culminating in… a heritage foundation conceived plan to further enshrine private insurers and the profit motive, the core blight, into our broken healthcare system. Then have his party never stop bragging about doing so. The DNC still acts like we should be thanking them for using their super majority to do… That.

                  Yeah, at this point, this government is too captured to hope for anything but pain rationally, at least on the timescale of human lifespans.

                  Unfortunately many don’t take the next step, look at nations that do serve their people like the Nordic model, and revolt for a government that serves them in similar fashion.

                  Because you do have to be a completely blind, willfully ignorant sucker to still believe our vote can do more than let us tread water.

            • Allonzee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Got it, no one is receiving literal methadone so it it can’t be. /s

              Language evolves.

                • Allonzee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Agreed, but no one would be threatening to annex Canada or abolish income derived repayment for student loans either.

                  Even one being slightly less harmful is harm reduction. Both are taking us on a train ride to hell, and one going 65 is still harm reduction when the only other choice is a train ride to hell at 75.

                  Harm reduction means there’s no good option. You can argue accelerating towards collapse with Trump will make things better faster than limping along until capitalist climate change forces it in 20 years or so, but you never know what you’ll get on the other side, could be an iron fisted military dictatorship with Don Jr. As the permanent figurehead.

                  Sometimes, providing clean needles so the heroin user doesn’t ALSO get HIV is better than not. Something that works as a metaphor, and also a social policy position our two capitalist owned parties do disagree on in practice. That’s something the owners allow us to have an opinion on, as thats a poorie problem that doesn’t meaningfully effect their profit expectations. No skin off their nose.

    • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Those are all neoliberals, nothing good would come of them being president, and the voting results speak for themselves. Neoliberalism wont work in this country anymore, if you want to beat republicans, elect progressives.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Same.

      But there’s not enough willing to hold their noses for us to reliably win elections.

      So it doesn’t make sense to blame anyone besides the people at the DNC actively stopping the type of candidates those people would love to vote for and instead cramming someone the majority of the party dislikes down our throats and hoping enough hold their noses.

      Like, not even from a perspective of which policy is better, just on the basis of what wins elections…

      Why isn’t the DNC backing the candidates who are most popular with Dem voters?

      Why do they keep picking the ones that will get the most donations, then trying to use that money to build up to less than the support the popular candidate already had?

      And why the fuck is anyone blaming anyone besides them?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And why the fuck is anyone blaming anyone besides them?

        Because if the democrats can deflect blame (again) they don’t have to deliver the change obama promised all those years ago.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        It quite literally is a reduction of harm. If two options are presented one is extremely harmful and one is slightly harmful, then voting for the slightly harmful one is a reduction of harm. Harm. reduction.

        I don’t know what you are talking about with “harm reduction has a specific meaning…voting is not harm reduction.” because the words literally mean a reduction in the amount of harm, whether active or potential.

        Even if you can provide an alternate definition, that is more of an example of the versatility of the language allowing multiple definitions, than any commentary on the current subject.

  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.

    Dipshits

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I voted for the Westboro Baptist church because I’m a transwoman dating a cisman and I imagine that putting them in a position of power over me can only go well. /s