• FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If a developing fetus looks anything like this or is anywhere near that large after a month, that’s not a baby it’s a demon or some shit.

    Oh, you meant an actual baby after birth. Ok, I get you now.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    4 months ago

    If your baby has that many teeth at that age, there is something wrong

    Besides: it’s not their problem that you can’t empathize with people who are feeling more love and joy than you could ever imagine.

    • sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      feeling more love and joy

      How is this related to posting pictures online?

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        They live vicariously. They only understand something if there is a picture or video of it.

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            In that they’re both photos surrounding the birth of a baby. Something that most people experiencing view as a precious and fleeting time they’d like to have nice pictures of.

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        So because you don’t understand which feelings this almost blind ugly little meatbag in that photo represents, there will be those who do and who will share the joy, making the world a little less depressing as fuck. Which is a benefit. But of course,. because you can’t understand that, no one possibly can.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t think pictures of minors should be posted online.

          You do you tho

          • Norgur@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            I wholeheartedly agree, just for different reasons than presented here. Yet, especially as long as they look like moles, posting them isn’t that bad.

            I’ve never posted pictures of my child online. I don’t even post them on private chats. Just via my immich instance to his grandmas and aunts.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lemmy really hates people posting baby pictures. Because a newborn can’t give consent. We all look like the same weird alien meatvblobs anyway when we come out, it’s not like it’s somehow identifiable. But can’t consent. I’m a bit surprised Lemmy isn’t anti-abortion for this reason.

          In fact in some jurisdictions, are minors even allowed to give such consent? If no, then you would have to remove all pictures of anyone younger than adulthood from the internet.

          For child actors, presumably it is the parents who give permission to the producers to use their child’s image. So any tv show, movie or commercial with kids should also be wrong for that reason.

          • Sidhean@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That minors can’t consent to anything, even when supported by a consenting guardian, is pretty extreme, but I kinda agree with most of what you say here.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Found a fresh parent.

      How are your hobbies doing? Been anywhere interesting lately? Sleep good?

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      A friend of mine has a baby and he’s certainly in that joy category. I guess it shouldn’t surprise me because it was essential for the survival of the species, but I’m still surprised that people like babies. Kids can be cute when they’re old enough to talk and use the toilet, and even then they’re only cute if they’re the charming kids-say-the-darnest-things sort and not the tantrum-throwing sort. Meanwhile puppies and kittens are cute from the moment they’re born.

      (Why do humans babies make such horrible sounds when they need something? A puppy whimpering makes me want to give it whatever it’s asking for. A baby crying makes me angry. I suppose the crying is harder to simply ignore.)

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Meanwhile puppies and kittens are cute from the moment they’re born.

        I see you haven’t had to stimulate a newborn kitten’s ass to get it to poop.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I had to do a lot for my dog that could be considered gross in an abstract sense but it never bothered me much. I suppose that was because he was my cute dog and not just because he was a cute dog, but being a cute dog certainly helped. It’s notable that I did not feel that same way about my little sister when I was 11 and she was born. She’s a great person now but I didn’t like helping take care of her even though I didn’t have to do it much; I think that’s a big reason why I don’t have my own children.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m glad that there are people convinced that the most misery you can feel is worth all the “joy”