AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]

  • 3 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • While I can appreciate how much effort you put into the affectation of the appearance of intelligence, and how well you’ve internalized “more words = more good” as a writing style, I observe that you are still a dumb motherfucker who should just keep their idiot mouth shut. In addition to being a terminally online ‘internet tough guy’ without any experience talking to real people.

    Epistemically speaking the burden of the proof falls on both, since you’re “conveniently” omitting that you didn’t just “cast doubt” towards OP’s claims - you also did your own claims there, by implying that the ban was to exclude [ipsis ungulis] “their toxic asses” from the community. (Whatever “toxic” means.)

    Basic reading comprehension: I was calling you and the rabble of .world accounts toxic.

    Have you ever heard about presumption of innocence?

    Yeah, I’ve heard of it. Where did you hear of it? In a court system? Not on a private forum the owners of which can decide who they want to join or not?

    Again, I’m not calling you a fucking moron frivolously. You’re a fucking moron.

    gullibleness

    The word is “gullibility”

    lol

    If you want evidences of that, just go dig on the defederation of ani.social, where the admin team distorted the concept of child sexual abuse material to [unnecessarily] justify it.

    Ordinarily I wouldn’t expect someone to brag about moderating a pedophile instance.

    This concludes my response titled “Why you’re too much of a stupid piece of shit to engage with seriously”


    1. They posted a crosspost link on .ml to the stardew valley comm they created, contradicting their complaint about getting banned

    2. The mod log says they were banned for breaking the rule against bigotry

    3. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim, you fucking moron, not the person casting doubt on it

    Just on a personal note, you’re a fucking idiot for taking a story like this on face value when even in the OP’s text the actual reason for the ban isn’t touched on. It’s amazing how poor your critical thinking skills are.





  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.nettoMeta@jlai.luDé-fédération de hexbear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    You’re lazy and stupid.

    If i do as you said, i can select some comments out of context that will invalidate your point.

    My point was that he said a thing. You can go look to see if he did. You’re lazy.

    You chose instead to reside in your mind palace and make ditzy, sophomoric philosophical statement.

    As for Ukraine war crime, i haven’t read and i’m busy but i’m guessing they probably exist.

    You’re stupid. Not only are you apparently proud of not reading, you lack comprehension in reading just this argument. You’ve changed the subject to be about whether or not nazis have committed war crimes. So I guess it opens the possibility that you’re just a cynical nazi doing apologism.

    Either way, what a worthless interaction you’ve inflicted upon me.



  • So you take this group of nazis that has locked people inside burning buildings, and you contrast their war crimes favorably to their enemies by singling out “mercy killings” as if that’s the only thing they’ve done. Contrasted by multiple superlatives towards the enemy’s spectrum of war crimes you couldn’t even list.

    I never said you support war crimes; I implied you support nazis.




  • You should have realized that I adapt my tone to the one I respond to, by like, reading?

    See? You literally just say shit that has no connection to reality. Here you claim to read. You have proven to everyone that you do not. Not only by your ignorant handling of the original comment you replied to, but also now by ignoring both my statement and reasoning behind pointing out that you DO NOT adapt your tone to the one you’re responding to!

    Nothing you say means anything because everything you say is predetermined by your attitude alone. You don’t read. Even if you did it would have no effect on what your opinion or response is. It has been shown now twice.

    I don’t think we have the same definition of reasonable, might have been lost in translation I guess.

    smuglord


  • For someone now saying there isn’t an argument, you sure did use three consecutive angry adjectives in the same sentence to respond to their comment.

    You’ve got quite the imbalance of nerve and self reflection, crying about people being aggressive and acting like unhinged assholes after how you just acted.

    All you do is illustrate how profoundly meaningless your words are. You use the same invective to someone being reasonable as you do someone scolding you.


  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.nettoMeta@jlai.luDé-fédération de hexbear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    You’ve convinced everyone with an attention span too short to read their comment and believe they can get the gist by reading the shorter response.

    Anyone who actually read their comment and your description rightly see you as cowardly, stupid, and unhinged.

    Your backhanded way of avoiding an argument is to paint their comment in a certain light and ignore its content. I haven’t seen anyone say this obvious truth out loud yet so I will.