• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Deathstalker 1 & 2, although the second is far superior.

    It’s completely tone deaf by any standards, let alone modern ones. Watch as a gang rape is interrupted and turned into what can only be described as a “heroic sexual assault”.

    The second swaps out the main actor for a much funnier one, and has probably the catchiest out-of-place theme tune of any movie.

    You know you’re watching a terrible movie, but they breeze along and you can’t help but be entertained by it.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s a polarizing one for sure. Every review is either 10/10 or 1/10.

      I’m firmly in the latter camp, I see the gold and white dress, and I hear Yanny. Mileage may vary.

  • Fontasia@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    In 2006, a movie was released in which an evil AI is defeated by Shia LeBouf.

    The evil AI’s plan? Kill the president!

    Why does the AI want to kill the president? he has too much unchecked power and bombed village of innocent people in the middle east and the AI told him not to because it could not confirm if there was actually a terrorist there.

    How does Shia LeBouf defeat the evil AI? Opening fire at the capitol to cause a panic.

    The war in Iraq was ramping up at the time, how was there not rioting at screenings? How is this not a controversial movie?

    The acting is not great, but it deserves better than 27% on Rotten Tomatoes when the message of the film is the government does bad stuff and should be persecuted for it

    Eagle Eye | Rotten Tomatoes

  • Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For me it was Alice in Wonderland (2010). I really enjoyed the whole “I do six impossible things before breakfast” thing. I was also really drunk when I watched it.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hey man like what you like. Most reviews are done by people who are WAAAAY to into cinema.

  • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Batman V Superman from 2016.

    My local theatre had an early early show: an early morning premiere, a day earlier than the official release date.

    In spite of the, frankly, stupid trailer #2, I was still excited to see the first live action movie with Batman and Superman with my fellow nerds.

    We came out of the theatre thinking it was a good movie, with Lex Luthor’s odd shenanigans aside (mannerisms, maintaining tabs on meta humans with well designed logos, etc.).

    I specifically remember appreciating and talking about the movie’s score (Hans Zimmer), cinematography (Larry Fong), and costumes (Michael Wilkinson and Ironhead Studios).

    While driving back, one of us checked the reviews and box office indications, and it was abysmal. The reaction was so bad that there was unspoken agreement between us to never talk about it again in public.

    I still like the movie, and like the Ultimate Edition even more. But I wasn’t a fan of all the movies that followed.

    E: grammar

  • corstian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Joker 2. Laughing my ass of to all the people complaining about how it ruined the image of the joker for them.

  • weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    2003’s the core. I always loved the semi friendly rivalry between Zimsky and Brazz. And how Keys (the main character) is sort of the glue that holds the team together and I think the cast has a good energy together as a whole. Combine that with genuinely enjoyable yet ridiculous 90’s style end of the world action / world destruction scenes and you got a 10 / 10 in my book.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I like The Core but omg it’s objectively terrible. “Unobtanium” is just a buckyball. The random kid drawing in the notebook just for heartstrings. Them welding power connectors right next to each other on the hull so that even IF their nonsense theory was correct they’d only be 0.01% efficient. Oh, and if the core stopped spinning it wouldn’t get the planet roasted anyway.

      But hey, it’s a B movie so I give it some slack.

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I watched Last Action Hero a few years ago for the first time, and it honestly didn’t even feel that dated. It held up!

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think Last Action Hero is an overall good movie with some flaws.

      It takes a little too long to get going, the bit at the front that mostly establishes that his life is kind of dull and he prefers to go to the movies drags a bit. They play the “BECAUSE THIS IS A MOVIE” note a little too often and Slater just outright doesn’t believe him for a little too long, he should have started to buy it before they go out into the real world. And the ending kind of just putters out? The bits where it’s a send-up of action flicks is really fun and it’s worth seeing for that, though I think True Lies is a better loving send-up of action flicks.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Haha, we need to open source movies before production. Put the script on GitHub and check those pull requests!

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The butterfly effect.

    I saw it when I was rather young but I thought it was pretty good, apparently people thought it’s edgy.

    Should watch it again now and see if it holds up.

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Saw it as a teenager. Its edgy but I enjoyed watching it.

      Until the prison/stigmata scene that completely broke the movies own rules. The whole fuking point is he goes back in time to change something and he is the only one who knows it. To everyone else that is just how the past has always been. But not in that scene! People actively see the world change due to him changing the past. (Oh and him mutilating himself as a kid changes nothing about his live except for the scars? He ends up in the same jailcell with the same cellmate 25 years later? Sure.) Even as a teenager i realised the gigantic plot hole.

      With that scene its a 3/10 movie for me. But not because it is edgy.

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I saw a version with a different ending (cuz piracy) than that what was widely released in theaters and i really liked it. Have you seen both? Do you know what I’m talking about?

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        there’s 3 endings. theater one was where he told the girl at the party he hated her, and they never met.

        second is he goes back to a baby memory and kills himself or his mom from the womb I think?

        third he runs into the girl as an adult after never meeting her, she went to live with her mom instead of the abusive dad.he recognizes her on the street and starts to follow her, roll credits.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’ve heard in the theatrical version he goes back and ends his friendship right? In the version i saw

          seriously cw warning i warned you

          He goes back in to the womb using a sonogram and wraps the umbilical cord around his neck killing himself so he instead never meets her


    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I saw it when I was rather young but I thought it was pretty good, apparently people thought it’s edgy.

      That’s me, I’m people. Same as you, I remember watching it when I was young and thinking it was a cool mature thriller, but I rewatched it last year for the first time and I was honestly a little shocked at how edgy it seems. Like the first 30 minutes really hammer how much trauma Evan went through, and it just felt really heavy handed.

      edit: to be clear I don’t hate The Butterfly Effect, I just remember distinctly thinking how edgy it was on review

  • slurpeesoforion@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah… I don’t care. I watch a movie and accept it for what it is. If I’m entertained for a few hours, great. If not, meh. I don’t need critical opinion.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I agree. I usually do it out of curiosity though. I tend to find, in general, the reviews are on par though.

      The number of times I watch something and afterwards am like “that felt kind of shit”, turns out everyone else agrees and I’m wondering why I didn’t check first to save my time.

    • hellodcooper@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      ‘Most’ People on the internet want to ascribe to a hivemind. Basically what the OP is suggesting with this thought exercise regarding films we have watched. It’s very sad, people need to watch a film, make a decision and stop flip flopping cause their group says something else about film.

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    i feel like it’s much harder when you finish a movie, and you hate it, and then find out it’s one of the most critically acclaimed movies of all time.

    this was my experience watching taxi driver. to this day, i have not been able to find a single other person who disliked that movie as much as i did

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I cannot stand 2001 A Space Odyssey

      It’s glacially paced, there’s like 1 good scene with HAL and Dave and the rotating set is neat with him running around the edge. It’s about 20 minutes of decent movie padded to an agonising two and a half hours of pretentious nonsense.

      People go “oh, but it was groundbreaking at the time!” We’d had Star Trek for two years by that point. It really was not that groundbreaking.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        exactly how i feel about it too. the 5 minute long segment that was just nature footage with weird visual filters was also particularly hard to watch.

        i also found the whole obelisk thing super repetitive. i was hoping that they would go into more detail about the obelisks, and explore the topic more. but it ended up feeling like they were asking the question “what’s a list of weird times and places where we could put an obelisk”, and that was the extent of it.

    • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I turned off Oppenheimer, felt so pretentious and over the top serious to me. I already knew people love it, though.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        thank you! i also couldn’t stand that movie. watching oppenheimer felt like watching a 3 hour trailer for oppenheimer. i can’t understand nolan’s refusal to let a scene last for more than 1 minute

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’d imagine this happens a lot more often than the OP’s scenario. Some complete garbage becomes “critical darling” for whatever reasons.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      That’s how I felt about Paranormal Activity. It was like I spent the entire movie waiting for something scary to happen. A thing just… stood there. Every “night” on screen felt the same: a being… just standing there. Not standing there sharpening a knife. Not standing there ominously stroking people’s cheeks. Nothing attacked or even made threats to do so. It just. fucking. stood. there.

      Then when something finally started to happen, the movie ended.

      I don’t know if my standards for “scary” are too high, but I found the entire film (save for those last few seconds) to be extremely boring. How it’s so popular (and even spawned a sequel?!) is beyond me.

      • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That was how I felt about Blair Witch. Full disclosure, I don’t like horror to begin with, but to me the movie was about a group of people in the woods with a scary thing somewhere, and when they finally find the thing it ends.

        It’s like if Texas Chainsaw was about a bunch of teenagers who stood around while you hear a chainsaw running somewhere in the distance, the cuts to black right when the killer shows up.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s been a while and I can’t remember which one it was that I saw, but I remember that ending coming out of nowhere. It’s like oh, there’s a ghost or something haunting the place, ok. Signs of evil or something, a person floating while sleeping, too iirc.

        Then suddenly there’s hundreds of witches or cultists surrounding them outside and it just ends!?

        Maybe it would have been scary if I was the type to buy into moral panics?

        It was just kinda creepy and then weird. Felt like “rocks fall, everyone dies” kinda energy.

    • JayObey711@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Oh my god I just watched taxi driver and thought it was mediocre at best. Gave it 2 1/2 stars. Saw that it sits at 4,2?!?

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        taxi driver felt like it was asking the question “what if we made a movie where nothing happens?”. and apparently, if you make the main character “disturbed” enough, the answer is that the movie becomes one of the greatest films of all time.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I get this, other than Pulp Fiction, I dislike all of Tarantino’s films.

      I don’t like the style or the pacing, I don’t like the revisionist take on events.

      But people generally like his films.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        i can sympathize with this. i also didn’t like many of the tarantino movies that i’ve seen for similar reasons. the feet stuff also doesn’t help his case.

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Same, not for Taxi Driver, but for The Deer Hunter, Chinatown, Life is Beautiful, Amour…

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        i also wasn’t very impressed by chinatown. i remember feeling like i spent the whole time waiting for the movie to “start”, and then it ended

    • Plum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I did a deep dive into pre-2000’s Schwarzenegger movies recently and they’re basically all good.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        True Lies is truly great. There are a bunch of other good choices in there too, but true lies really sticks in my head.